WarGameGuru
  • Home
  • Reviews
    • Interview - Matt Wagner/Eagle Dynamics
    • Interview - Polychop Simulations
    • Review - MonsterTech HOTAS Table Mounts
    • Review - Rebel Galaxy Outlaw
    • Review - EVGA 2080 Super Black Gaming 8GB Video Card
    • Review - ASUS VG49VQ 49 Inch Super Ultra Wide Gaming Monitor
    • In Focus Review - Heatblur's F-14 Tomcat Module for DCS World
    • Classic Review - Jetfighter III
    • Review - Thrustmaster T.Flight Rudder Pedals
    • Review - Thrustmaster HOTAS WARTHOG Joystick
    • First Impressions - DCS World High Fidelity Modules
    • Classic Review - Suncom Strike Fighter Series Throttle
    • Classic Review - F-22 Pro Joystick from Thrustmaster
    • Classic Review - EuroFighter 2000
    • In Focus Review - DCS World Persian Gulf Map Module
    • Classic Review - US NAVY Fighters
    • Review -TrackIR 5 from NaturalPoint
    • Review - Thrustmaster T16000M FCS HOTAS
    • Classic Review - Jane's AH-64D Longbow
    • In Focus Review - DCS World Revisited: Diving off the Flaming Cliffs
    • In Focus Review - State of Flight-Sims and HOTAS Games 2019
    • Review - Flamberge/Jumping Atlas/WASP WSP-1 Models from Iron Wind Metals
    • Review - Star Trek Starships Collection
    • Review - Knight Models Arkham City Bane 35mm Model
    • Review - Knight Models Man of Steel & Frank Miller Batman 35mm Models
    • Review - Mecha Zone 2: The Art of David A White
    • In Focus Review - SuperSystem 3rd Edition
    • In Focus Review - Heavy Gear: Arena Two-Player Starter Set
    • Review - JUNK: Dogface Combots from Grindhouse Games
    • In Focus Review - ShadowSea from AntiMatter Games
    • Review - TRO 3085 Lance Pack
    • Review - Technical Read Out 3085 & Record Sheets 3085
    • In Focus Review - JR Miniatures 25mm Medieval Structures
    • In Focus Review - Dust Tactics
    • In Focus Review - War Rocket
    • In Focus Review/Interview - Plasma Blast Games 6mm Sci-Fi Models
    • Review - PortableWarfare Sergeant Case
    • Review - Steel Warriors
    • Review - Having Good Hex: Hex Bases 101
    • Review - Xmarx & Old Crow 6mm Sci-Fi Models
    • Review - BattleTech Mech Models
    • In Focus Review - BattleTech
    • Review - Song Of Our Ancestors
    • In Focus Review - BattleTech Total Warfare Core Rulebook
    • Review -Rosemary & Co Brushes
    • Review - Q-Workshop Pirate & Sniper Dice
    • Review - HiTech Miniatures SF Commander & 25mm Resin Bases
    • Review - Tengu Models
    • Review - Atomic Super Humans
    • In Focus Review - Warlord 2nd Edition/Savage North
    • Review - The Complete Guide to Miniature Painting
    • Review - JR Miniatures 15mm Scale Terrain
    • Review - HellDorado LOST Starter Set Review
    • Review - Heavy Gear: Black Talon Return to Cat's Eye
    • Review - Mantic Games Dwarfs Iron Belcher Cannon Review
    • Review - Heavy Infantry/Kolony Feral HQ Models
    • Review - HellDorado Westerners Starter Set
    • In Focus Review - Heavy Gear Interpolar War 2-Player Starter Set
    • Review - Micro-Art Studio Hive/Power Plant and Ruins Bases
    • Review - Wargames Factory Shock Troops Models
    • Review - Mantic Games Dwarfs IronClad Regiment
    • Review - Mantic Games Dwarfs Ironwatch Troop
    • Review - MERCS Minis FCC Models
    • In Focus Review - Incursion board game from Grindhouse Games
    • Review - Incursion Models from Grindhouse Games
    • Review - MERCS Minis USCR Models
    • In Focus Review - AE Bounty from Darkson Designs
    • Review - AE Bounty Starter Set Models
    • Review - Micro-Art Studio Great Wolves
    • Review - Kabuki Models Revisited
    • In Focus Review - Eden Post Apocalyptic Skirmish Game
    • Review - Soda Pop Miniatures Models
    • In Focus Review - Warpaints Wargaming Starter Paints Set
    • Review - Freebooter's Fate: Crew Expansion Models
    • In Focus Review - Quantum Gothic Part III
    • Review - Ron & Bones Undead/Skeleton Models
    • Review - Zynvaded Starter Set
    • In Focus Review/Interview - Reaper Miniatures, Inc
    • Review - Armory Primer
    • Review - Pulp City Models
    • In Focus Review - Bob Smith Industries CA Adhesives
    • In Focus Review - Derivan MiNiS Paints
    • In Focus Review - MaxMini Models & Bitz
    • In Focus Review - Studio Miniatures Models
    • Review - Q-Workshop's Forest & Celtic Dice Sets
    • In Focus Review - The Army Painter QuickShade
    • In Focus Review - da Vinci paint brushes
    • In Focus Review - Ramshackle Games Post Apocalyptic Models
    • In Focus Review - Brotherhood of Assassins
    • In Focus Review - Flames of War - Dogs and Devils Campaign Book
    • In Focus Review - Flames of War: Open Fire Starter Set
    • In Focus Review - Wardroids
    • In Focus Review - Coat D' Arms Acrylic Paints
    • In Focus Review - HeroScape Dungeons & Dragons Master Set 3 - Battle for Underdark
    • In Focus Review - Dice of the Dead
    • In Focus Review - Please Stand By
    • In Focus Review - Fear And Faith
    • In Focus Review - Filla-Glu
    • First Look Preview - AE Bounty
    • In Focus Review - The Army Painter Brushes
    • In Focus Review - Crooked Dice Game Design Studio
    • In Focus Review - Quantum Gothic Revisited
    • Preview - Judge Dredd
    • In Focus Review - Tannhauser Revised Edition
    • In Focus Review - Freebooter's Fate
    • Preview - Dust Tactics/City of Thieves
    • In Focus Review - Mutants and Death Ray Guns
    • In Focus Review - Song of Blades and Heroes
    • PC Hardware Review - Saitek X-52 Pro HOTAS
    • In Focus Review - Knight Models: Star Wars 30mm Models
    • PC Review - Wings of Prey
    • In Focus Review - Pig Iron Productions Kolony Feral Squad & Specialists
    • In Focus Review - Q-Workshop Dice
    • PC Review - Torchlight
    • Review - The Adventurers
    • In Focus Review - Mantic Games: Introduction to the Undead
    • In Focus Review - Red Ops 5
    • In Focus Review - All Things Zombie: Better Dead Than Zed
    • In Focus - The Coolest Game You'll Probably Never Play!
    • In Focus Review - Atlas Brush Company, Inc.
    • In Focus Review - Ziterdes Models
    • In Focus Review - Micro-Art Studios
    • In Focus Review - Faction Wars
    • PC Review - Warhammer 40k: Dawn of War II Chaos Rising
    • In Focus Review - Pegasus Models
    • Classic Review: Mage Knight 2.0
    • Review In Focus: Quantum Gothic
    • PC Review: Airstrike Eagles of World War II
    • In Focus Review - Avatars of War & Arena DeathMatch
    • Review In Focus: Windsor & Newton
    • First Look Preview: Kabuki Models
    • Classic Review: How to paint Citadel Miniatures
    • Review: Pig Iron System Troopers/Kolony Militia
    • Classic Review: In Focus ESLO Terrain
    • In Focus Review: MERCS YellowJackets & KemVar
    • Review: Toy Soldiers 101: Little Wars
    • Review: Warmachine Plastic Heavy Warjack kits
    • Editorial: State of the Game Warhammer 40k
    • P3 Model Drilling & Pinning Set
    • Review: Miniature Paints 101
    • Review: Kabuki Models 21st Century Pinups & Dark Messiah
    • Review: Cool Wargame tools
    • Classic Review: Warmachine 2003
    • Retribution of Scyrah Overview
    • Classic Review: Lord of the Rings Return of the King Strategy Battle Game
    • Classic Review: Dogs of War
    • Review: Sabol Monthy Deals
  • Want your product covered?

November 24th, 2010
Review - The Sergeant Carrying Case

from Portable Warfare & Blu foam trays from PHD
Picture
There's quite a few options out there today when it comes to miniature model transports for wargaming. The latest company to step up to the plate with a carrying case is Portable Warfare. They're a new small company, which operates from the Sunshine State, Florida.

Their debut product is called the Sergeant. This is a rundown of the features direct from their website...8" x 8" velcro front pocket, 4" x 8" velcro front pocket, 2 side drink holders, Cargo Net in the back, Bag Dimensions 12"H x 13"W x 7"D, Removable Strap and Stacking clasps on top and bottom.

I'm surprised to learn that they didn't even list all of their own features for the bag. There's also a velcro pocket on the inside of the lid flap. I'm not quite sure where there's a front pocket with the dimensions 4x8 that they list, but on the front of the case there's a skinny velcro pocket and a large velcro pocket. The main front pocket is a zipper pocket too, which they also didn't mention. I tested it out with the 300+ page hardcover BattleTech rulebooks Total Warfare, A Time of War and the Tech Manual, and any of those books fit just fine with a wee bit of room to spare.

The material feels like a canvas-like fabric, and the stitching seemed tight and durable all around. The Sergeant looks to be constructed very well. This is also a softbag just like the majority of the Sabol offerings. As for the features they mentioned... The cargo net on the back of the case is large enough to fit most any standard size rulebook, even some thicker ones like the BattleTech tomes I tried out in the front pocket. The two front velcro pockets also expand enough to fit most of the gaming essentials (stat cards in top loaders, dry erase markers, tape measures, beads/counters, a couple of Snickers, etc). The drink holders can double for holding a dice brick, cell-phone, etc.

Inside you can fit a little under 12-inches worth of foam trays, and the trays they use are the Blu branded foam trays. For the record they sell the Sergeant cases empty, but Portable Warfare offers two different loadouts of Blu trays as an option for someone who wants a case with foam trays included, since they don't make their own trays.

The loadout I was sent includes 1x 3-inch Blu tray, 2x 2-inch Blu trays and 2x 1.5-inch Blu trays. The other option is Loadout #2 which includes 1x 3-inch Blu tray, 1x 2-inch Blu tray, 1x 1.5-inch Blu tray and 3x 1-inch Blu trays.

If you're not familiar with the Blu trays, they're almost identical in dimensions to the Sabol Designs trays, but are cut with rounded corners, and the backing foam is blue instead of black. With the assortment included with this case (Loadout #1 option), I measured 11.5-inches in Blu trays, as the trays are all actually 1/4th of a inch thicker than the said size, due to the backing foam.

I measured the complete usable space on a Blu tray, and on a Sabol Designs foam tray, and both measure the same at 6.75 inches top to bottom and 12-inches across the length of the trays. To be exact the area I measured is where the pluck foam can begin being plucked, to the other edge where it can begin being plucked top to bottom and lengthwise both.

Therefore in terms of the full capacity of each tray, they're literally identical. I thought for sure that cutting the corner on the Blu backing foam might have taken some storage space away, but it didn't.

If the rounded corner design is useful, or just for show can be debated I'm sure too. Some might be able to say that the rounded corner makes it a little bit easier to get the trays out of a bag. When you're using a case that zippers down to reveal the entire stack of trays, then that feature is redundant.

The Sergeant does zipper like a traditional Army Transport opening from the top, but also if you zipper it down further the entire side falls away to reveal the entire stack of trays. So the rounded corner design of the Blu tray serves no purpose in this case (no pun intended). I'm honestly seeing no difference between the Blu trays and a standard Sabol Designs tray outside of the fact that they're blue and have rounded corners.

One of the complaints people have had with the Sabol trays for years is that the glue meant to seal the backing to the foam can sometimes stick to models. This can occur when you pluck away the foam from the outermost edges of a tray, which is where the tray backing is glued to the pluck foam body The Blu trays are no different in this respect. As my one photo reveals, as soon as I plucked some squares out of the Blu tray, the glue was not only staring me in the face, it was very sticky and ready to pluck the paint off my models!

I'm really not complaining about the glue issue either, because the Sabol trays have had the same problem for years now, only with those trays it's hit or miss with the glue issue, because they've been aware of it for years, and they've done their best to avoid it. I'll give Blu the same benefit of the doubt, that I'm sure not every Blu tray will be this way, but some no doubt will have that problem.
There's a temporary fix for that issue too, which is why it doesn't upset me too much.

The easiest way to remedy the issue is to take a piece of foam you plucked away and jam it right on top of the sticky spot, and let it be a buffer between your model and the glue spot. That's what I did with the Blu tray when I put my Mechs in one of the trays. Now I'm able to use the tray without any worries.

The owner of Portable Warfare was also waiting for new stock of trays from PHD (makers of Blu foam) right before I was sent the bag and trays for review, and what I was sent were brand new straight from the Blu factory too. Which totally explains what I encountered. Fresh glue is always the culprit.  The glue will eventually dry and harden on any of these trays.

  In the end it's clear that the Blu trays aren't any better, or any worse than a Sabol Designs tray. From my point of view they're 99% identical in every way, except one of the two has a rounded corner blue backing foam.

It was pointed out as well that the blue backing foam on each Blu tray is supposed to be stronger, offering more stability than a Sabol tray when loaded with models. I checked that claim, as I  looked at both trays side by side and I'm not seeing that one is any stronger than the other. I do know that sometimes with any of these pluck trays, if you overload a tray and pluck away too much foam that you do end up with a tray that's less stable, because the backing foam relies on what's left glued to it for some of the overall tray stability.

So if you end up with a tray that's completely full and has only bits and pieces of foam left for walls in between models, sure that tray will be less stable, because common sense dictates that there's no structural integrity left to support all the weight. A single backing board alone isn't going to fix that problem.

It should also be known that Portable Warfare has partnered with PHD/Blu foam to sell the trays with their cases, but doesn't make or design Blu foam. Portable Warfare just makes the case. You also don't need to buy their case with any foam trays at all, because they come standard without the Blu foam. They just offer the Blu foam in two different package deals to get you everything you need in a carrying case all at once. I was sent a full case with a full Blu foam load-out, and that's the only reason I even mentioned the Blu foam trays at all.

Back to the topic of the case. I also found it funny that the clasps on the top and bottom of the case will link right up with a Sabol Designs case. I have a few of the Army Transport Platoons lying around and when I saw the design I had to try it. And to my surprise you can link up an Army Transport Platoon to the Sergeant or a Sergeant to an Army Transport Platoon.

I'm sure this was meant so you could link a Sergeant to another Sergeant, but since the clasps are nearly identical to the Sabol clasps, they just happen to link with them too. So if you have an existing Sabol case, the Sergeant can link up and piggyback off of it, or vice versa.

Conclusion

If I had to compare the Sergeant to any other product out there, I'd say it is most like the Army Transport Mark II. Feature for feature the Sergeant is almost identical to the Mark II, but adds some features of its own too.

The Sergeant has the two mesh drink holder pockets one on each side, and the Sergeant can unzip to allow access through the top like most transport cases, plus you can unzip it further which removes the lid and entire side of the case all at once revealing the full stack of trays inside. The Mark II doesn't have the drink pockets, or the means to open from the top, just the side drops down
on it to reveal the stack of trays.

Also the Sergeant on the outside is made from a different material.
On the inside the Sergeant looks just like any of the Army Transport cases, because they all resemble a vinyl six pack cooler with that same silver-ish/gray vinyl padded interior.

The dimensions of an Army Transport Mark II is also 14"H x 14"W x 9"D, with a 13-inch capacity for trays. The Sergeant is 12"H x 13"W x 7"D, and has roughly a hair under 12-inch tray capacity, which is a tight squeeze. Realistically I have 11.5-inches total in there now and it's a tight fit, so I'd say it's a safer bet to stick with no more than 11.5-inches total in trays.

Again taking into account all pluck trays be it Sabol or Blu foam have 1/4th of an inch foam backing boards, you're really only going to fit roughly 11-inches of actual models in either of these cases. The only difference is that the Sabol Army Transport Mark II case is going to allow you to do so with a little more breathing room since it's a little deeper in depth.

The big question is, do I think this is better than the Army Transport Mark II? Well let me put it this way, the Army Transport Mark II is $34.99 empty. The Portable Warfare Sergeant is $37.95 empty. If it was a matter of money, the Mark II is cheaper, and it will handle the storage and transportation of models task just as well as the Sergeant.

However both cases hold very close to the same number of trays in inches, and if you took photos of the cases from the inside you couldn't tell which case you were looking at. The majority of the differences are cosmetic and limited to the exterior between the two products. I like the means to load or unload from the top, or the side both, so the Sergeant wins there.

Both cases have that big front pocket with a zipper, rear cargo net pockets, and two front pockets with velcro, the only difference is that the Sabol bag has two compartments of the same size, but the Portable Warfare case made one of their two front velcro pockets bigger than the other, and they're an inch taller than the Sabol pockets, so they're both taking up almost the same real estate in the end. There's one more thing that the Sergeant has over the Sabol cases. The Sergeant comes in three different colors. The Sabol cases are all the same color.

You can order an Army Green, GunMetal Gray or Chaos Pink Sergeant case. At present the Pink ones are out of stock, because those actually sold out very soon after the website made them available. I was sent the Army Green version for review. Now that all of the facts have been presented, I have to admit the Sergeant is pretty much a nicer looking Army Transport Mark II, only with a couple more bells and whistles.

Between the two cases alone you're talking about the price difference of just $3. I should also add that the BattleFoam bags have some really nice bells and whistles and hard wall designs too, but both the Portable Warfare and Sabol Designs offerings are substantially more affordable than any thing from BattleFoam. I only used Sabol to compare the Sergeant too, because it's really the only closest competitor feature for feature, and both are close to being in the same price range.

As for the Blu trays. They're actually $1.50 more per tray on average over standard Sabol trays, and aside from a rounded corner and a blue backer foam, they're identical in most every way. My advice would be if you're in the market for a new case, the Sergeant isn't at all a bad option, but if you were to purchase one I'd take the money you planned on spending on trays and buy the Sabol trays instead saving a few bucks overall.


Blu is attempting to claim they're a better design, but I think what ever money they spent on research and design was wasted, because in use I find that they're no different than a Sabol tray, but cost considerably more. Actually the Sabol trays are all the same price ($8.50 each), but the Blu trays begin to go up in price as you move up to the thicker sizes too.

Even IF the blue backing board on paper is more rigid than Sabol's, most gamers take care when handling their trays any how, and no single more rigid backing foam is worth the difference of +$1.50 more per tray. Making matters worse a 3-4 inch Blu tray is $$3.00-3.50 per tray more than a Sabol tray too!

That's insane pricing, and in this economy it's outright ignorant of PHD to think gamers are that stupid. They're nice trays yes, but if I'm going to pay that much more per tray, I might as well toss in a few more dollars and jump up to the next level to pay BattleFoam's ludicrius prices for a newer laser cut form fitting foam tray design for my models.

They both have the same exact positive and negative features. I see no reason to pay more for trays of a different color when they're going to be inside the case most of the time any way. The color of the exterior of the case however, that just might be worth paying $3 more to some gaming enthusiasts. The sergeant certainly looks nicer than the existing Sabol bags, but it's not a revolutionary step beyond any of the existing designs out there either.

Quite frankly Portable Warfare just prettied up an existing carrying case design that clearly works (the Army Transport II), by putting their own twist on it and brought them to market. Which isn't a bad thing at all, because it really is a nice case and they managed to put it together and bring it to market for just $3 more than the competition. The way I see it gamers now have another solid option to choose from, and options are always good.


Portable Warfare's Website

    Comments or Suggestions?

Submit

Follow WarGameGuru on Twitter

Picture
Be sure to visit our sponsors!



Picture
Be sure to visit our sponsors!

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.